
A review of my dictionary revealed no fewer than 55 terms which included the word “work”. This hints at the importance of this concept for humans.
When homo sapiens emerged from darkest Africa they were hunters and collectors. They were mobile beings, following food sources, and inventing more efficient methods of collection. Their daily “work” must have been driven primarily by the need for food and shelter. The need for food and shelter persists, but man’s evolution has resulted in the development of a startling array of increasingly specialised occupations.
The range of human perspectives on the nature and meaning of work has evolved simultaneously.
At a very basic physiological level, we are creatures of daily habit. Our diurnal clock demands that we rest at night and become active during daylight hours. One wonders whether our relatively poor night vision has been a factor here. Did our vulnerability to predators at night necessitate protective measures (shelter)? This might then have become the time when we re-charged our physiological batteries.
Great human construction endeavours such as the pyramids and the architecture of Rome and religion required massive work forces. People needed to be organised in some way to achieve these feats. Time efficiencies were not really an issue. Several generations of stone masons from the same family would work on one major cathedral; their “life’s work” indeed.
The most visible recent change in the nature of work occurred with the Industrial Revolution, beginning in the UK and Europe in the 1850’s. Prior to this the average number of people employed in a business was between 3 and 4. People had very direct contact with their customers and every aspect of the production of their wares. Working hours were determined by necessity.
The birth of the factory brought major change. The principle was to use efficiencies of scale and organisation (dividing the manufacturing process into discreet tasks, each performed by specifically trained teams or individuals) to turn raw materials into saleable products. Human workers were seen as part of the economy of production, with a view to maximising profit.
Suddenly, the timing of the working day was imposed by the employer upon the employee. Workers were paid for their efforts (usually poorly) and lived in centres near their places or work (towns). They depended upon the wages they earned to provide for their families. Work provided a very rigid structure within which to exist.
No matter how unusual the work we do, it still provides us with food, shelter and structure. There is considerable variation in the “meaning” we attach to our work. Society has imposed a loose hierarchy of importance to various types of work. A job concerned with research to counter some threat to our species (eg. disease or global warming) might be seen by some as more important than an occupation such as farming. However, a moment’s reflection would tell us that if the researcher had nothing to eat his work wouldn’t continue for long. This hints at the complex way in which human society has organised itself to provide the basics which have enabled specialisation into various fields of endeavour.
What matters a lot to us humans is how we see ourselves. Our work is an important part of that appraisal. To be doing work which is consistent with our basic values has some benefits for psychological wellbeing.
So, on the one hand is the need for work to provide the very basics of life, and on the other is a complex system of values associated with the nature and perceived importance of our work.
If we are to spend a significant part of our life at work, it is worth considering how work affects our wellbeing and how to counter any negative effects.
The defining feature of the last 20 years of human history is the rapidity of change. Much has been made of globilisation in an economic sense. However, the emergence of net driven improvements in communication has also resulted in dramatic intellectual globilisation. Ideas are, after all, much more pertinent in the process of our evolution than is money, though you can’t eat either!
The nature of economics and of work practices has changed dramatically over the past 40 years. In 1960 it took 4 years for 30% of the Fortune 500’s top listed companies in the USA to change. Now it takes 6 months. The average number of employers of a 65 year old in 1960 was 4. Now, it is 8 by the age of 30 years.
However, let’s not paint work as some sinister, but necessary grey cloud over our existence. We have already seen how it has evolved with us as a species. It provides structure and some predictability to our lives. It buys food and puts a roof over our heads. It gives us a sense of purpose (struggling with this existential issue also seems to be part of the human condition) and meaning. It provides a constant learning focus. It provides a social network. A lot of marriages begin in the work place. When you think of it, these are the people with whom you have large amounts of interpersonal contact.
Having considered the evolution of work and its benefits, we should now consider some potential pitfalls.
The open plan office has re-emerged over the last 10-15 years, as employers seek cost savings when providing space for their staff. This way of doing things works when there are like-minded, similarly-qualified people working on innovation based projects eg. software development units, R & D based firms such as the Gore Corporation. Here, the need is for regular brainstorming and consultation. This is facilitated by an open plan arrangement, provided there is also space for more private interactions and work.
For most people in open plan offices there are significant problems. The most frequent complaints concern the noise and lack of privacy when working in these environments. It is difficult to personalise a work space. Some offices even have “hot” desks used by anyone on a needs basis; even less “personal”. The open plan arrangement accentuates the differential status between the haves and the have nots (of offices). The 20% savings in terms of heating and lighting costs must be offset against the lack of individual’s ability to adjust the light and heat in their particular working space.
In 2008 Dr V Oommen of QUT revealed decreases in productivity, increased levels of interpersonal conflict, increased staff turnover and increased stress- related illnesses from open plan offices. Infectious diseases are much more likely to be spread in an open plan situation. The question here is whether short term cost savings are more than cancelled out by the problems associated with working in open plan offices.
This all stresses the importance of one’s physical work environment. If you are in one of these open plan situations, the following ideas bears some consideration.
The interpersonal environment can also be problematic. Most people have encountered “the bully”. Bullies are intimidating and take pleasure from “winning” in any encounter. They are all the more dangerous when in positions of power. They often resort to personal criticism rather than reasoned argument. People around them feel intimidated and de-valued, and are constantly on the alert for the next onslaught.
Manipulative people can also cause problems as a result of “splitting”. They work on people in previously well established relationships. They do this by endearing themselves to one friend and then implying that the other friend “is not all they seem”. Suspicions and doubts arise between people who previously trusted each other. Manipulators can cause havoc if the two effected people don’t “compare notes”. These people often have a trail of human debris behind them. They can usually moderate their behaviour for a few months in a new environment, but things generally deteriorate soon after.
Having looked at some factors outside ourselves which may affect wellbeing, it must be said that the primary responsibility for our wellbeing rests clearly in our own hands.
There is much that can be done to counter the negative effects of work upon our enjoyment of being alive. You will note that every suggestion requires ACTION. No one delivers happiness to your door. Failure to act could result in “burn-out”.
Burn-out was first described in the 1970’s. It happens when a person invests too much of their time and self in work, at the expense of relationships and other personal interests. People experience the insidious onset of lack of energy and interest in work and life in general. They feel physically and mentally exhausted. Those aware of the symptoms of depression will note some similarities. Left unchecked, burn-out can gradually morph into a major depressive illness. This is an appalling price to pay.
The process of making personal sense of the work and non-work aspects of our lives is an ongoing pursuit. It is occurring in a changing world. It is occurring in the context of personal development. It is a full time job.